Operational Design Domain Coverage for the Safety Validation of Automated Driving Systems
Authors:
Georg Stettinger, Johannes Rumetshofer, Patrick Weissensteiner, Simon Genser, Daniel Watzenig
Keywords:
automated driving, operational design domain, virtual validation, coverage
Abstract:
Cite this article
Weissensteiner P.; Genser S.; Stettinger G.; Rumetshofer J. and Watzenig D. Operational Design Domain Coverage for the Safety Validation of Automated Driving Systems In: Proceedings of the Driving Simulation Conference 2022 Europe VR, Driving Simulation Association, Strasbourg, France, 2022, pp. 49-56
@inproceedings{Weissensteiner2022, title = {Operational Design Domain Coverage for the Safety Validation of Automated Driving Systems}, author = {Patrick Weissensteiner and Simon Genser and Georg Stettinger and Johannes Rumetshofer and Daniel Watzenig}, editor = {Andras Kemeny and Jean-Rémy Chardonnet and Florent Colombet}, year = {2022}, date = {2022-09-15}, booktitle = {Proceedings of the Driving Simulation Conference 2022 Europe VR}, pages = {49-56}, address = {Strasbourg, France}, organization = {Driving Simulation Association}, abstract = {Automated driving systems can encounter an infinite number of scenarios in real-world traffic. Although a scenario-based approach can significantly reduce the number of test cases for validating such systems, the amount is still unfeasible for real-world tests. Introduced validation strategies try to cope with that but have an inconsistent definition of operational design domain coverage. The proposed method combines existing ideas of scenario-based with a disturbance-based assessment relying on physics principles by embedding them into a method for the safety validation of ADS, including a proposal for the coverage evaluation. This approach exploits the fact that a finite number of physics principles are relevant for the safe operation of an automated driving system and are potential root causes for failure. A dedicated proof-of-concept consisting of an automated lanekeeping system, focussing on traffic disturbance scenarios, uses the suggested method. Essentially, using the concrete example of a logical scenario for a cut-in also shows that the physics principles-based approach, which defines disturbances, can be combined with a data-driven approach for an overall scenario-based assessment. Furthermore, a categorisation for the useful key performance indicators to evaluate an executed concrete scenario is introduced.}, keywords = {automated driving, coverage, operational design domain, virtual validation}, }
TY - CONF TI - Operational Design Domain Coverage for the Safety Validation of Automated Driving Systems AU - Weissensteiner, Patrick AU - Genser, Simon AU - Stettinger, Georg AU - Rumetshofer, Johannes AU - Watzenig, Daniel C1 - Strasbourg, France C3 - Proceedings of the Driving Simulation Conference 2022 Europe VR DA - 2022/09/15 PY - 2022 SP - 49 EP - 56 LA - en-US PB - Driving Simulation Association L2 - https://proceedings.driving-simulation.org/proceeding/dsc-2022/operational-design-domain-coverage-for-the-safety-validation-of-automated-driving-systems ER -
A Driving Simulation Association membership is required in order to download the papers.