Authors:
Joost Venrooij, Daan M. Pool, Markus Schwienbacher, Maurice Kolff, Max Mulder
Keywords:
motion cueing, simulator comparison, quality comparison, objective assessment
Abstract:
Kolff M.; Venrooij J.; Schwienbacher M.; Pool D.M. and Mulder M. Motion Cueing Quality Comparison of Driving Simulators using Oracle Motion Cueing In: Proceedings of the Driving Simulation Conference 2022 Europe VR, Driving Simulation Association, Strasbourg, France, 2022, pp. 111-118
Download .txt file
@inproceedings{Kolff2022,
title = {Motion Cueing Quality Comparison of Driving Simulators using Oracle Motion Cueing},
author = {Maurice Kolff and Joost Venrooij and Markus Schwienbacher and Daan M. Pool and Max Mulder},
editor = {Andras Kemeny and Jean-Rémy Chardonnet and Florent Colombet},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-09-15},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the Driving Simulation Conference 2022 Europe VR},
pages = {111-118},
address = {Strasbourg, France},
organization = {Driving Simulation Association},
abstract = {BMW’s new driving simulation center operates multiple motion-base simulators – each with a different kinematic configuration – to serve various experiment use-cases and requirements of simulator users. The selection of a simulator for each experiment should ideally be based on their relative strengths and weaknesses. To support this decision-making process, subjective and objective predictions of motion cueing quality can be used. This paper provides an example comparison of four motion-base driving simulators. The kinematic configurations of the simulators considered differed in the additional presence of a yaw-drive and/or a linear xy-drive. The comparison is made by calculating offline, optimization-based motion cueing with perfect prediction capabilities (the ‘Oracle’) for nine urban drives. A prediction of subjective motion incongruence ratings is made for each simulator. In addition, an error type identification method is used (identifying scaling, missing cue, false cue and false direction cue errors) and evaluated per simulator. As Oracle can fully utilize the available workspace, the employed evaluation methods provide an insight in the fundamental capabilities of each simulator. Both the modelled ratings and the error type analysis show the benefits of adding a xy-drive in urban use-cases: predicted ratings reduce by 19% (i.e., better), while scaling and missing cue errors in the yaw rate are reduced when adding a yaw-drive. The presence of both of these additional motion systems allow for practically one-to-one and therefore error-free motion cueing. The proposed methods provide a straight-forward, yet insightful basis for simulator selection. The presented methods can be extended towards the analysis of multiple motion cueing algorithms and/or other usecases for systematically selecting the best-suited motion cueing method.},
keywords = {motion cueing, objective assessment, quality comparison, simulator comparison},
}
Download .bib file
TY - CONF
TI - Motion Cueing Quality Comparison of Driving Simulators using Oracle Motion Cueing
AU - Kolff, Maurice
AU - Venrooij, Joost
AU - Schwienbacher, Markus
AU - Pool, Daan M.
AU - Mulder, Max
C1 - Strasbourg, France
C3 - Proceedings of the Driving Simulation Conference 2022 Europe VR
DA - 2022/09/15
PY - 2022
SP - 111
EP - 118
LA - en-US
PB - Driving Simulation Association
L2 - https://proceedings.driving-simulation.org/proceeding/dsc-2022/motion-cueing-quality-comparison-of-driving-simulators-using-oracle-motion-cueing
ER -
Download .ris file
Cite this article
Terms and Conditions for Downloading Driving Simulation Proceedings papers:
By downloading a scientific paper from proceedings.driving-simulation.org, you agree to the following terms and conditions:
- Personal Use Only:
The scientific paper provided on this website is solely for personal, educational, and non-commercial use. You may download and use the paper for your own reference and research purposes only.
- No Reproduction or Distribution:
You may not reproduce, distribute, transmit, publish, or otherwise make the paper available to any third party in any form, whether for commercial or non-commercial purposes, without the express written consent of the Driving Simulation Association.
- Copyright and Ownership:
The scientific paper is protected by copyright laws and is the intellectual property of the respective authors and publishers. All rights not expressly granted herein are reserved.
- Citation and Attribution:
If you use the scientific paper for research, presentations, or any other non-commercial purposes, you must provide appropriate citation and attribution to the original authors as per academic standards.
- No Modification:
You may not modify, alter, or adapt the content of the scientific paper in any way.
- Disclaimer:
The Driving Simulation Association makes no representations or warranties regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of the scientific paper for any particular purpose. The paper is provided as-is, without any warranties, express or implied. The Driving Simulation Association reserves the right to terminate or restrict access to the scientific paper at any time and without notice.