Authors:
Ehsan Sadraei, Richard Romano, Samantha Jamson, Gustav Markkula, Hamish Jamson
Keywords:
motion cueing, fidelity corridor, sliding rail size
Abstract:
Driving simulator motion bases have various mechanisms and characteristics; among them, the synergistic 6DoF hexapod-type integrated with a sliding rail is the most commonly used. There is a large variety in workspaces (sizes) of both the hexapod and sliding rail used in research and training simulators, and there lacks consensus on what size of motion base is really needed in order to provide high fidelity motion cueing. In this paper we introduce an approach that balances between having acceptable fidelity of motion cueing while at the same time addressing the minimum size requirement to reduce the purchase cost. A conventional classic motion cueing algorithm (MCA) is used together with an optimization method to establish the minimum workspace requirement, while meeting the fidelity criteria defined in literature. The right sizing requirements are driving task dependent, so in order to test this method, low and high motion-demanding driving tasks are tested using the experimental data collected from professional drivers. A standard (high) and a reduced (low) amount of tilt coordination is selected, showing how this defines a range of rail sizes to consider.
Sadraei E.; Romano R.; Jamson S.; Markkula G. and Jamson H. Driving simulator motion base right sizing In: Proceedings of the Driving Simulation Conference 2018 Europe VR, Driving Simulation Association, Antibes, France, 2018, pp. 113-120
Download .txt file
@inproceedings{Sadraei2018,
title = {Driving simulator motion base right sizing},
author = {Ehsan Sadraei and Richard Romano and Samantha Jamson and Gustav Markkula and Hamish Jamson},
editor = {Andras Kemeny and Florent Colombet and Frédéric Merienne and Stéphane Espié},
isbn = {978-2-85782-734-4},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-09-05},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the Driving Simulation Conference 2018 Europe VR},
pages = {113-120},
address = {Antibes, France},
organization = {Driving Simulation Association},
abstract = {Driving simulator motion bases have various mechanisms and characteristics; among them, the synergistic 6DoF hexapod-type integrated with a sliding rail is the most commonly used. There is a large variety in workspaces (sizes) of both the hexapod and sliding rail used in research and training simulators, and there lacks consensus on what size of motion base is really needed in order to provide high fidelity motion cueing. In this paper we introduce an approach that balances between having acceptable fidelity of motion cueing while at the same time addressing the minimum size requirement to reduce the purchase cost. A conventional classic motion cueing algorithm (MCA) is used together with an optimization method to establish the minimum workspace requirement, while meeting the fidelity criteria defined in literature. The right sizing requirements are driving task dependent, so in order to test this method, low and high motion-demanding driving tasks are tested using the experimental data collected from professional drivers. A standard (high) and a reduced (low) amount of tilt coordination is selected, showing how this defines a range of rail sizes to consider.},
keywords = {fidelity corridor, motion cueing, sliding rail size},
}
Download .bib file
TY - CONF
TI - Driving simulator motion base right sizing
AU - Sadraei, Ehsan
AU - Romano, Richard
AU - Jamson, Samantha
AU - Markkula, Gustav
AU - Jamson, Hamish
C1 - Antibes, France
C3 - Proceedings of the Driving Simulation Conference 2018 Europe VR
DA - 2018/09/05
PY - 2018
SP - 113
EP - 120
LA - en-US
PB - Driving Simulation Association
SN - 978-2-85782-734-4
L2 - https://proceedings.driving-simulation.org/proceeding/dsc-2018/driving-simulator-motion-base-right-sizing
ER -
Download .ris file
Cite this article
Terms and Conditions for Downloading Driving Simulation Proceedings papers:
By downloading a scientific paper from proceedings.driving-simulation.org, you agree to the following terms and conditions:
- Personal Use Only:
The scientific paper provided on this website is solely for personal, educational, and non-commercial use. You may download and use the paper for your own reference and research purposes only.
- No Reproduction or Distribution:
You may not reproduce, distribute, transmit, publish, or otherwise make the paper available to any third party in any form, whether for commercial or non-commercial purposes, without the express written consent of the Driving Simulation Association.
- Copyright and Ownership:
The scientific paper is protected by copyright laws and is the intellectual property of the respective authors and publishers. All rights not expressly granted herein are reserved.
- Citation and Attribution:
If you use the scientific paper for research, presentations, or any other non-commercial purposes, you must provide appropriate citation and attribution to the original authors as per academic standards.
- No Modification:
You may not modify, alter, or adapt the content of the scientific paper in any way.
- Disclaimer:
The Driving Simulation Association makes no representations or warranties regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of the scientific paper for any particular purpose. The paper is provided as-is, without any warranties, express or implied. The Driving Simulation Association reserves the right to terminate or restrict access to the scientific paper at any time and without notice.