Authors:
Joost Venrooij, Diane Cleij, Mikhail Katliar, Paolo Pretto, Heinrich H. Bülthoff, Dennis Steffen, Friedrich W. Hoffmeyer, Hans-Peter Schoener
Keywords:
motion cueing, optimization-based, filter-based, continuous rating
Abstract:
This paper describes a driving simulation experiment, executed on the Daimler Driving Simulator (DDS), in which a filter-based and an optimization-based motion cueing algorithm (MCA) were compared using a newly developed motion cueing quality rating method. The goal of the comparison was to investigate whether optimization-based MCAs have, compared to filter-based approaches, the potential to improve the quality of motion simulations. The paper describes the two algorithms, discusses their strengths and weaknesses and describes the experimental methods and results. The MCAs were compared in an experiment where 18 participants rated the perceived motion mismatch, i.e., the perceived mismatch between the motion felt in the simulator and the motion one would expect from a drive in a real car. The results show that the quality of the motion cueing was rated better for the optimization-based MCA than for the filter-based MCA, indicating that there exists a potential to improve the quality of the motion simulation with optimization-based methods. Furthermore, it was shown that the rating method provides reliable and repeatable results within and between participants, which further establishes the utility of the method.
Venrooij J.; Cleij D.; Katliar M.; Pretto P.; Bülthoff H.H.; Steffen D.; Hoffmeyer F.W. and Schoener H.-P. Comparison between filter- and optimization-based motion cueing in the Daimler Driving Simulator In: Proceedings of the Driving Simulation Conference 2016 Europe, Driving Simulation Association, Paris, France, 2016, pp. 31-38
Download .txt file
@inproceedings{Venrooij2016,
title = {Comparison between filter- and optimization-based motion cueing in the Daimler Driving Simulator},
author = {Joost Venrooij and Diane Cleij and Mikhail Katliar and Paolo Pretto and Heinrich H. Bülthoff and Dennis Steffen and Friedrich W. Hoffmeyer and Hans-Peter Schoener},
editor = {Andras Kemeny and Frédéric Merienne and Florent Colombet and Stéphane Espié},
issn = {0769-0266},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-09-07},
booktitle = {Proceedings of the Driving Simulation Conference 2016 Europe},
pages = {31-38},
address = {Paris, France},
organization = {Driving Simulation Association},
abstract = {This paper describes a driving simulation experiment, executed on the Daimler Driving Simulator (DDS), in which a filter-based and an optimization-based motion cueing algorithm (MCA) were compared using a newly developed motion cueing quality rating method. The goal of the comparison was to investigate whether optimization-based MCAs have, compared to filter-based approaches, the potential to improve the quality of motion simulations. The paper describes the two algorithms, discusses their strengths and weaknesses and describes the experimental methods and results. The MCAs were compared in an experiment where 18 participants rated the perceived motion mismatch, i.e., the perceived mismatch between the motion felt in the simulator and the motion one would expect from a drive in a real car. The results show that the quality of the motion cueing was rated better for the optimization-based MCA than for the filter-based MCA, indicating that there exists a potential to improve the quality of the motion simulation with optimization-based methods. Furthermore, it was shown that the rating method provides reliable and repeatable results within and between participants, which further establishes the utility of the method.},
keywords = {continuous rating, filter-based, motion cueing, optimization-based},
}
Download .bib file
TY - CONF
TI - Comparison between filter- and optimization-based motion cueing in the Daimler Driving Simulator
AU - Venrooij, Joost
AU - Cleij, Diane
AU - Katliar, Mikhail
AU - Pretto, Paolo
AU - Bülthoff, Heinrich H.
AU - Steffen, Dennis
AU - Hoffmeyer, Friedrich W.
AU - Schoener, Hans-Peter
C1 - Paris, France
C3 - Proceedings of the Driving Simulation Conference 2016 Europe
DA - 2016/09/07
PY - 2016
SP - 31
EP - 38
LA - en-US
PB - Driving Simulation Association
SN - 0769-0266
L2 - https://proceedings.driving-simulation.org/proceeding/dsc-2016/comparison-between-filter-and-optimization-based-motion-cueing-in-the-daimler-driving-simulator
ER -
Download .ris file
Cite this article
Terms and Conditions for Downloading Driving Simulation Proceedings papers:
By downloading a scientific paper from proceedings.driving-simulation.org, you agree to the following terms and conditions:
- Personal Use Only:
The scientific paper provided on this website is solely for personal, educational, and non-commercial use. You may download and use the paper for your own reference and research purposes only.
- No Reproduction or Distribution:
You may not reproduce, distribute, transmit, publish, or otherwise make the paper available to any third party in any form, whether for commercial or non-commercial purposes, without the express written consent of the Driving Simulation Association.
- Copyright and Ownership:
The scientific paper is protected by copyright laws and is the intellectual property of the respective authors and publishers. All rights not expressly granted herein are reserved.
- Citation and Attribution:
If you use the scientific paper for research, presentations, or any other non-commercial purposes, you must provide appropriate citation and attribution to the original authors as per academic standards.
- No Modification:
You may not modify, alter, or adapt the content of the scientific paper in any way.
- Disclaimer:
The Driving Simulation Association makes no representations or warranties regarding the accuracy, completeness, or suitability of the scientific paper for any particular purpose. The paper is provided as-is, without any warranties, express or implied. The Driving Simulation Association reserves the right to terminate or restrict access to the scientific paper at any time and without notice.